Écrit le 17 janvier 2010 à 9:25

Being supersmart

I’m supersmart. Or at least that is how I like to consider myself. I failed the Mensa test by quite a long shot, but I can assure you from experience this does not mean much – Mensans are the people among whom I feel the best, which certainly means more than a failed test.

Either at work or at play, I’m usually the smartest guy around. Not necessarily the fastest (I think I may even be slower than the average Joe), but certainly the best at connecting the dots. Sure, that could be said of any iNtuitive (MBTI) person, but I think there is more than that.

I long considered myself as inferior and needed several unrelated persons telling me otherwise to start believing it. I also share another common trait with (« certified ») supersmarts: I believe I am a deceptive person, that is, that people overestimates me. Add this to the well-known complex of autodidacts (my knowledge is worth nothing because I don’t have a diploma for it) and you will start to understand how far it may go.

I now am very proud to (consider myself to) be supersmart (although there is no objective reason to be proud of something one did not choose), but this is not a blessing. I may say that one lives in a state of segregation, but the optimistic in me prefers to say that supersmarts live on a higher ground. Maybe consider it as a « intellectual tetrachromacy: where you see two things, I see four and more to wait behind them. Also, if you see a two-level deep scenario, I see the layers three and four too. Once again, this is an iNtuitive trait, but I think it is particularly exarcebated in supersmarts.

Like Cassandra, I am usually right but to no avail. It seems I also suffer from Kretschmer’s sensitive paranoïa (the best article I found is French, unfortunately – Délire de relation des sensitifs).

Tonight, I had a revelation. I finally put words regarding my mindset (and that’s why I’m writing this blog entry). I usually am in what I call « data processing mode ». Most people are subjected to their surroundings. Me, I analyse my surroundings. Where you see pictures, odors and people, I see patterns. Do you know The Watchmen’s Dr. Manhattan? Then consider his feeling of aloofness, this is what I experience most of the time (but on a much lower scale!). For this reason alone, believe me, being supersmart is not a blessing. I am tired of living alone.

Oh, by the way: I am not a mere nerd. I met enough of them to tell a nerd from a supersmart.

2 réactions à “Being supersmart”

  1. Krysztof von Murphy le 17 janvier 2010 à 15 h 17 min a dit :

    Fais gaffe de pas surcompenser :-)

  2. David Latapie le 17 janvier 2010 à 19 h 26 min a dit :

    Oh, mais je surcompense déjà ! Non seulement j’en ai conscience, mais ça ne me dérange pas. Je dois en avoir gros sur la patate…

Laisser une réponse


Empyrée is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache